Michael Bird has posted his list of the
Top 25 NT Scholars, a post which cries out for comment--and comments have followed by some including
Mark Goodacre and
Jim West.
It's a good list overall, and I think if I were to produce my own top 25 it would be mostly the

same, even if the placements might be different. For example, I'd agree with Jim that Luther should not be number one, and quite frankly I'm not sure he'd even make my list of top 25 New Testament scholars. Among the Reformers, John Calvin was a much better exegete and more akin to modern 'biblical scholars' than Luther was. I'd also agree with Jim that Bultmann has got to be top 5--an influential scholar who continues to be referred to in almost every area of New Testament studies, even if in some whole areas he was utterly wrong. Mark's point that Michael's list is a bit evangelical heavy is well taken, but Michael did say it includes both his favourites as well as those which were influential (of course, 'favourites' are going to play into any such list, whether that is stated or not). However, I would still certainly include F. F. Bruce, although I. H. Marshall might be moved out to honourable mention in mine.
Who to replace Luther and Marshall, and maybe others on the list? I think I'd agree with Mark on Gerd Theissen, and I'd be tempted to include Oscar Cullmann. I'd also look to some more scholars from the past at least for honourable mention: Albert Schweitzer quickly comes to mind, for example.
Fun stuff! The whole discussion reminds me of the
'Who was better: Gretzky or Orr?' sorts of debates you have with your friends at
Tim Hortons after the game. Maybe we can continue this discussion at
SBL? :-)
UPDATE (10/04): Michael has now quite appropriately
amended his list to include Schweitzer in the top 10 (tied for 7th with Sanders), and to refine his honourable mention list.
Labels: academics and scholarship, new testament