the stuff of earth

Monday, August 07, 2006

a blogentary on 1 thessalonians: preface

With this post I begin a new series: a "blogentary" or blog commentary on 1 Thessalonians. Here is a bit of a preface to this series in the form of Frequently Asked Questions (that haven't yet been asked, let alone frequently).

Why a "blog commentary" on 1 Thessalonians?

This is really two questions:
  1. Why 1 Thessalonians? My doctoral research is centred on a particular passage in 1 Thessalonians, and so I've spent a good deal of time in this Pauline letter. As I've gone through it again and again in both Greek and English, I've grown to love this little letter in a way that's probably abnormally odd (repetitively redundant, I know). It has tremendous historical significance, as possibly the earliest Christian writing we possess. Its theological and formational significance is far richer than it has typically been given credit for; these facets of the text have too often been taken hostage by eschatological questions and perspectives that are alien to the text. In short, 1 Thessalonians has much to offer.
  2. Why a blogentary? Quite simple: no one wants to buy a print commentary written by me (at least not yet), so this is the only way I could get it published. :-) Actually, however much that may be the case, the real answer is that I want to explore and experiment: I want to explore the meaning and significance of 1 Thessalonians and how I can best express these, and I want to experiment with the medium of blogging and see what its potential might be for this sort of endeavour.
What distinguishes this blogentary from a commentary?

I'm not really sure yet, but here are some ways I see my blogentary taking advantage of the blogging side of things:
  1. A somewhat more informal style. I may use big words from time to time (I do like the sound of them), but I hope that overall this commentary will be like thinking out loud with a friend over a cup of coffee. In particular, I look forward to a distinct lack of referencing--not that I will not have read the work of others (I certainly will) or never cite anything (I sometimes will), but I plan on keeping references to a minimum. This may make for bad academic protocol but hopefully it will make for better blogging (note to students: don't transfer this protocol to the genre of academic papers!).
  2. The use of hyperlinks. Having just said I will avoid reference citation as much as possible, I now say that I will employ the citation protocols of the 21st century as I feel so moved. These links could really point to anything, but will normally be items that may be helpful in providing further background.
  3. The ability for myself and others to comment. This will help to supplement the main commentary and to clarify it when my statements are unclear and need their own commentary.
What will be the format of this blogentary?

I'll begin with a few posts dealing with some of the standard introductory matters related to 1 Thessalonians, and then the blogentary proper will focus on individual sections of the text. Each of these sections will have up to four types of posts:
  1. Text and Translation. These posts will include the Greek text of the passage (in unicode, using Palatino Linotype; here's a test sample: ἐν λόγῳ κυρίου) and an English translation. I will be using the text found in the Nestle-Aland 27th and UBS 4th editions of the Greek New Testament. Text critical comments will be limited to the most significant issues. The translation will be my own, with some explanatory notes.
  2. Exegetical Notes. These posts will discuss some of the most significant exegetical questions posed by the text in its context: grammatical, lexical, historical, literary, and so on. Some passages may have very few of these sorts of issues; others will have several, and may require several of these posts to deal with them.
  3. Theological Reflection. These posts will present a sort of "flowing commentary" on the passage. I'm not quite sure what to call what I'm aiming for in these posts: it's not exegetical, historical, theological, homiletical, or devotional, but it may be all of these as I attempt to describe the meaning of the authors' words as written to the Thessalonians and the significance of these words for those today who share the basic theological worldview of the first authors and readers.
  4. Summary Paraphrase. These posts will conclude the section with an expanded paraphrase of the passage in light of the previous discussion.
How long will this blogentary take?

Fittingly, I hope to have it done before the parousia. Should that event be sufficiently delayed, this project could take several months, possibly a year or more. It is one of several side distractions for me while I complete my dissertation and teach full-time--all while maintaining a healthy personal life with family and friends. Posts will be posted as they are ready: sometimes that could be once or twice a week, at other times there could be a couple of weeks between posts. If there are no posts on this for several months, then you know I've been raptured and the tribulation has begun, in spite of my better theological judgment... ;-)

Labels: ,

7 Comments:

  • I look forward to your blogentary on I Thessalonians. Thanks for being willing to share the fruit of your studies of this book with those of us who also have grown to love this little letter.

    By Blogger ChristMyLife, at 9:33 AM  

  • Well done sir! I am excited to see the fruit of your work.

    Regards
    Joe

    By Blogger Dr. Joseph Ray Cathey, at 2:16 PM  

  • I'm looking forward to it, too.

    The term "blogmentary" has about 50 times more Google hits than "blogentary."

    By Blogger Stephen C. Carlson, at 5:51 PM  

  • Thanks for the comments, and Stephen, thanks for the note on "blogmentary." I didn't bother to Google it. I don't plan on using the term in the post titles, or very often otherwise, so I suppose it doesn't matter too much!

    By Blogger Michael Pahl, at 6:36 PM  

  • Hey Michael, I adore 1 Thessalonians, and I greatly anticipate your upcoming stuff. Any chance we could get an idea about what line your taking in your dissertational research, or is it too early, or is it too secret? :)

    Just out of curiosity, and since your post concerns preliminary questions, I'd like to ask: What unique contribution will your interpretation of 1 Thes. bring to the overall discussion (that of 1 Thes. in particular, Paul in general, and Christian origins in general)?

    By Blogger Matthew, at 8:01 AM  

  • Matthew, my dissertation is on "the word of the Lord" in 1 Thessalonians 4:15: what is it, how does it function there, etc. My basic take on it is no longer secret, as I'm presenting on it at the ETS meetings in November.

    Regarding your other question, I think the most distinctive thing about my commentary will be the medium. For example, when I list the primary textual witnesses to 1 Thess in an upcoming post, I can link to descriptions and photographs of various manuscripts. Print commentaries can't do that, and I don't think any of the older, public domain commentaries on the internet do that sort of thing (if they even talk about textual witnesses).

    As for content or perspective, I am hoping to bring out (at least in the Commentary sections) the foundational nature of the gospel message for Paul's response to the Thessalonian situation. The salvific message about Jesus centred on his death and resurrection runs right through the letter, and this explains such oft-debated passages as 2:1-12 better than traditional theories. I won't say more until I get to the commentary!

    By Blogger Michael Pahl, at 9:06 AM  

  • Michael, I'll also be really interested to follow how this works out. Especially the two main blog features that differ from what I have tried with Amos.

    Comments: readers emailed comments on Amos,
    and these impacted what I wrote, but they were
    not visible to other readers
    Internet links - when I began Amos (in the age
    of 9600 modems and unstable web hosting and URLs)
    I decided not to include external links.

    I agree with you that these two things can change a commentary radically. Though I still think that even internal links can change the genre hugely.

    By Blogger Tim, at 4:05 PM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home